Legal Opinion

County of Tehama v. Winter

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1922No. Civ. No. 2406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.

The county of Tehama, respondent herein,, brought suit against the appellant, its county assessor, to recover the sum of $1,506.60, retained as compensation for the collection of certain personal property taxes collected by him in his official capacity as such assessor. The county prevailed in the action and appellant brings this appeal from the judgment. He bases his claim to this percentage upon the provisions of subdivision 7 of section 4266 of the Political Code, which subdivision, it is admitted, deals with the compensation of the assessor of said county. Said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. De ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Winter v. De ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hedlund v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lesem v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API