Legal Opinion

Lesem v. Getty

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1937No. Civ. 2047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

San Diego County is organized and operating under a charter. (Stats. 1933, p. 2814.) Petitioner is a duly licensed and practicing physician and has been and is performing the duties of health officer or director of public health and sanitation of San Diego County. He is also director of public health of the city of San Diego and is performing the duties of health officer in several of the smaller municipalities of the county. On January 5, 1934, the state registrar of vital statistics appointed him local registar of vital statistics for the term ending January 5, 1938; for registration…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fowler v. BebeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  2. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Carleton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Reuter v. Bd. of Supervisors of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. GompperAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
  3. (HC) Vasquez v. GodwinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API