Hedlund v. Davis
California Supreme Court
No appearance for Respondent Board of Supervisors. Edward J. Allen, in pro. per., for Real Party in Interest.
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Earl P. Hedlund petitions for a writ of mandate to be addressed to the county clerk and to the Board of Supervisors of Tehama County. Petitioner asks that respondents be directed to perform such official duties respectively as under the law devolve upon them to the end (1) that the office of district attorney of the county of Tehama shall be placed upon the ballot at the general election to be held on November 6, 1956, in order that a qualified candidate may be elected at such general election to serve for the remainder of the unexpired term of Bruce Werlhof, who was elected in November,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Dewoody v. BeldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- County of Tehama v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3Cited by10 opinions
- Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Stanton v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Curphey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Robson v. Upper San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.