Winter v. De Shields
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the auditor of Tehama County to draw his warrant for salary claimed by petitioner. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NICOL, P. J., pro tem.
The petitioner is the assessor of Tehama County and makes this application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as auditor of said county, to draw his warrant in his favor for the sum of three hundred dollars, which amount is claimed by the petitioner as his salary as such assessor for the month of December, 1919.
The petitioner contends that his salary is three thousand six hundred dollars per annum as assessor of said county, as fixed by section 4266 of the Political Code, Tehama County, being a county of the thirty-seventh class. He bases this contention on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brooks v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. De ShieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- County of Tehama v. WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Creech v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Regan v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939