Legal Opinion

Schram v. Poole

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1940No. 9297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing with prejudice the bill of complaint of appellant Schram. The filing of this case succeeded an appeal sustaining a judgment dismissing a bill filed in an earlier suit against the same parties, except Poole, Jr., then a minor. Our opinion on the former appeal, stating the pleadings and most of the facts pertinent here, is reported in 97 F.2d 566. In it we held that there could be no recovery against Poole, as guardian, or against Poole Jr.’s estate because of the failure to join the minor. In the present suit the minor was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Early v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Hakes Investment Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Foster v. ChaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  2. Kelly v. BelcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kelly v. BelcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API