Legal Opinion

In re Day

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 31, 1941No. 4459PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenROot, Judge

Appellant here seeks reversal of a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for lack of patentability over the cited prior art, claims 13, 23, 24, and 25 of his application for a patent. No claims have been allowed.

Claim 13 is illustrative of the subject matter involved and reads as follows:

13. Method of concurrently and uniformly surface hardening gear teeth having a diametral pitch of about six or greater, which comprises rotating the gear about its axis at from about 50 to about 120 R. P. M. directing a plurality of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of AbramsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. In re ZonensteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re NormannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API