Legal Opinion
Mutchnick v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 20, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.
Plaintiff claims to have become wholly, continuously and permanently disabled on January 10, 1932. He furnished claim proofs on October 18, 1933, and has received disability benefits since that date. The issue is whether he is entitled to receive disability benefits from the date of claimed disability or from and after the date of filing of the proofs, and also whether he may recover premiums paid during such period of time. The complaint sets forth six causes of action based on three policies of insurance issued by the defendant on the life of the plaintiff, as follows: Policy No. 385170,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Ginell v. . the Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Bennett v. New York Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Michelson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York City Court · 1936
- Morton v. Washington National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.