Legal Opinion
Bennett v. New York Life Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1942No. 6935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.
— This action was instituted by Addie Bennett, (appellant) as beneficiary against the New York Life Insurance Company (respondent), to recover disability benefits under insurance policy issued by the company, May 21, 1929, on the life of Elmer J. Bennett. The policy provided for payment, in case of death, in the sum of $3,000, also double indemnity under specified cir cumstances and total disability benefits to insured under specified conditions.
Proof of death was duly made and the death benefit of $3,000 was paid to appellant, the beneficiary. Claim for disability benefits was made and also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Brams v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- New York Life Ins v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Neil v. New York Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Fisher v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Chagnon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Moscov v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Pearlstein v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.