Legal Opinion

Hallman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1946No. 47092PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs had a contract with defendant for the construction of some buildings at Fort Oglethorpe, Georgia, outside of Chattanooga, Tennessee. After plaintiffs submitted their bid the governing authorities at the Post promulgated a traffic regulation requiring vehicular traffic to come to a stop in the vicinity of troops moving in the streets. Plaintiffs say this regulation increased their cost of performance, and for this they sue.

The Government demurs because it says this regulation was of general application and was issued in the performance of a governmental function, to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
  3. Deming v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
  4. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Gothwaite v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Tony Downs Foods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Air Terminal Services, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Clemmer Const. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. Froemming Bros., Inc., of Texas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API