Legal Opinion

People v. Burnes

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1990No. E006573PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TIMLIN, J.

Defendant was convicted on pleas of guilty to two counts of possessing a controlled substance for purposes of sale. Defendant appeals from the sentence imposed with respect to those convictions.

Facts

By information, defendant was charged with the following criminal counts: Count I, conspiracy to sell methamphetamine (Pen. Code, § 182, and Health & Saf. Code, § 11379); count II, possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350); counts III and VI, possession of marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359); count IV, possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. TassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. WarinnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. McClanahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. Adam R.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API