Legal Opinion

Williams v. New York Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 19, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore Oitv Court (Stump, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The cause was argued before Briscoe, J., who presided, and Burke, Thomas, Urner, Stockbbidge and Constable, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

In 1892 the appellant, then twenty-six years of age, made an application to the New York Life Insurance Company, through Howland & Howard, general agents in the City of Baltimore, for insurance upon his life. The application was upon a blank form of the company, and in reply to the questions contained in it, the applicant designated the amount and character of insurance desired. The policy asked for was to be for $10,000 — of the description known as “Life, 20 premium”. It further provided that it should be an “accumulation policy”, and the applicant stated “I select the 20-year “accumulation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Horner v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  3. Hill v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Pierce v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. City of Lowell v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kronovet v. LipchinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Jackson v. Pasadena Receivables, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Stiegler v. Eureka Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  4. In Re Estate of ShirkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Cleaning Authority, Inc. v. NeubertDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API