Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 12, 1891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance, issued by the defendant company to the plaintiff and others, on a house and furniture situated in the town of Chester in Vermont. The policy was payable in case of loss to the plaintiff, and contained among other provisions the following9. ... In case differences shall arise touching any loss or damage after proof thereof has been received in due form, the matter shall, at the written request of either party, be submitted to impartial arbitrators, whose award in writing shall be binding on the parties as to the amount of such loss or damage,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Phœnix Insurance Co. v. BadgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Nurney v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Pierce v. Charter Oak Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Moody v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  2. Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Phenix Insurance v. StocksIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Brodbine v. Inhabitants of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Mittenthal v. MascagniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API