Legal Opinion

Kronovet v. Lipchin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 17, 1980No. [No. 137, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.

This appeal presents questions between developers-mortgagors and the permanent lender arising out of two actions by the lender to enforce remedies on default. The instant actions are but part of the panoply of litigation brought in the wake of the collapse of a multi-million dollar real estate venture. After trial the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County found for the lender. Certiorari was issued prior to consideration of the developers’ appeal by the intermediate appellate court.

In affirming the decree below, we shall hold in response to the contentions raised that:

1. The transaction is…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. General Engineering Corporation v. Martin Marietta Alumina, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API