Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Kroger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2010No. SC S057678PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 43 (2010). See ORS 250.085(2) (describing ballot title review process). Initiative Petition 43 (2010), if approved, would add to the Oregon Constitution’s provisions concerning the collection of voter signatures and the qualification of proposed initiative and referendum measures for submission to the voters. We review the certified ballot title for substantial compliance with statutory requirements. ORS 250.085(5).

The complete text of Initiative Petition 43 (2010) is as follows:

“In order to respect voter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Mabon v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kain v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Nearman/Miller v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Buehler v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API