Legal Opinion

Caruthers v. Kroger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2010No. SC S057678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This ballot title review proceeding involving the ballot title for Initiative Petition 43 (2010) is before us for a second time. In the first iteration, Caruthers v. Kroger, 347 Or 660, 227 P3d 723 (2010), this court held that the Attorney General’s certified ballot title was deficient in each of its parts — -the caption, the “yes” and “no” result statements, and the summary. We referred the matter back to the Attorney General to prepare a modified ballot title. Id. at 671. See ORS 250.085(8) (providing for that procedure).

In response to our referral, the Attorney General prepared and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API