Legal Opinion

Grevers v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1969No. Docket 4,674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

Plaintiffs’ action against defendant telephone company was for damages allegedly based upon negligence for failing to supply adequate service and using obsolete equipment. The lower court held the action was improperly started in circuit court because the remedy should have been pursued and exhausted at the administrative agency level prior to application for a hearing in a court of law. From this decision, plaintiff appeals.

When a plaintiff has an action based upon negligence consisting of using obsolete equipment and providing inadequate service, is he required to pursue his remedy for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Stark Steel Corp. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Huron Valley Steel Corp. v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API