Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Pommeranz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1995No. 94-2666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record and concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that he successfully completes a year of probation to be monitored by Jude T. Aubry. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Wright and Cook, JJ., dissent.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. PommeranzOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Toledo Bar Assn. v. PommeranzOhio Supreme Court · 1995