Legal Opinion

Van Der Veer v. Union Trust Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1920No. 10,558PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Floyd Circuit Court; James W. Fortune, Judge. Proceedings to collect taxes on property omitted from assessment by the board of commissioners of the county of Floyd against the Union Trust Company of Indianapolis, executor of the will of Newland T. De Pauw, wherein Ferdinand P. Van Der Veer filed an intervening petition. From a judgment dismissing the petition, the petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, P. J.

On and prior to May 13, 1912, Harry L. Glenn and appellant, Ferdinand P. Van Der Veer, were partners doing business under the firm name and style of Glenn and Van Der Veer, as “tax ferrets,” and on said date entered into a contract with the board of county commissioners of Floyd county, Indiana, by which they, for and in consideration of the promise of said board of commissioners to pay to them, for services to be by them rendered in that behalf, a sum equal to thirty-five per cent, “of the amount of - all taxes collected by the said county or its officials for any and all purposes,” agreed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wightman v. Evanston Yaryan Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Voorhees v. Indianapolis Car & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. WintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. McCaskey Register Co. v. CurfmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Anderson v. Jacksonville, P. & M. R.United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Dudley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Tomlinson v. JeffreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lighthill v. Garvin, ReceiverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API