Legal Opinion
United States v. Mottolo
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 27, 1984No. Civ. 83-547-DPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
The United States of America brings this action under section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), for reimbursement of costs incurred by the United States in response to the release or threat of release of hazardous substances into the environment from defendant Mottolo’s facility in Raymond, New Hampshire (“Mottolo site”). Jurisdiction is founded upon 28 U.S.C. § 1345.
Sutera Motion to Dismiss
Defendant Carl Sutera moves to dismiss claims brought against him by the United States.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. BlissDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1987
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co., Inc., a Dissolved Delaware Corporation, Edwin Michaels and John W. Lee, Ronald Mills and Syntex Agribusiness, Inc. United States of America v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co., Inc., a Dissolved Delaware Corporation, Edwin Michaels and John W. Lee, Ronald Mills and Syntex Agribusiness, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.