Legal Opinion
CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 18, 1989No. G89-10503 CAPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
This is an action brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. Plaintiff, CPC International (“CPC”), seeks to recover its response costs incurred in connection with a hazardous waste site in Dalton Township, Muskegon County, Michigan (the “Site”). Plaintiff claims that defendants Michigan Department of Natural Resources (“MDNR”), Aerojet-General Corporation (“Aerojet”), Cordova Chemical Company (“Cordova/California”), and Cor-dova Chemical Company of Michigan…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Nurad, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Shell Oil Co. v. MeyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Catellus Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.