Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Mazzotta
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
The plaintiff suffered an injury described as “fracture of right scapula; fracture of left scapula and laceration of scalp.” Under the terms of a volun tary agreement approved by the commissioner July 31st, 1930, the claimant was paid compensation to October 10th, 1930. On October 24th, after hearing before the commissioner for the first district, additional compensation was allowed for the two weeks from October 10th to October 24th. It was determined by the commissioner at that hearing that the claimant was then able to work, and it was therefore ordered that compensation should cease…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Saddlemire v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Grabowski v. MiskellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Pettiti v. T. J. Pardy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Storms v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Dillon v. MarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Vanzant v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kearns v. City of TorringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Nelson v. Cambria Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Morgan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.