In re Yannalfo
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The respondent, Gary Yannalfo, appeals from a decision of the Family Division {Maher, J.) alleging that the court erred as a matter of law when it voided an antenuptial agreement entered into by the parties. For the reasons that follow, we agree and reverse.
The following facts are supported by the record. The parties were married in July 1987. Approximately one month before the wedding, they purchased a home for $183,150. The respondent provided $70,000 as the down payment and the petitioner contributed $5,000 toward closing costs. A day or so before the wedding, the respondent presented the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zimmie v. ZimmieOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Lutgert v. LutgertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- MacFarlane v. RichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Goodwin Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Estate of HollettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- In re Estate of WilberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Andrew B. v. Abbie B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Stevens v. Liberty MutualDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- In the Matter of Marianna Nizhnikov and Alexander NizhnikovSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016