Legal Opinion

MacFarlane v. Rich

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 29, 1989No. 88-482PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The issue in this marital matter is whether an antenuptial agreement purporting to fix the post-divorce rights of the parties is valid and enforceable. The plaintiff-husband appeals from certain portions of a decree of divorce entered by the Superior Court {Smith, J.) which distributed marital assets and awarded alimony in accordance with the terms of an antenuptial agreement executed by the parties prior to their marriage. We affirm.

The plaintiff presents three issues for our review: first, did the trial court err in admitting and considering parol evidence contradicting the express terms of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Scherer v. SchererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Griswold v. Heat CorporationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  4. McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Bassler v. BasslerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Parkhurst v. GibsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. In Re Marriage of Pendleton & FiremanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. DeMatteo v. DeMatteoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API