Zimmie v. Zimmie
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
Six propositions of law have been presented by this appeal and cross-appeal.
I
The first issue raised in this cause is whether the trial court erred in its reinstatement of defendant’s counterclaim after its voluntary dismissal.
It is axiomatic that such dismissal deprives the trial court of jurisdiction over the matter dismissed. After its voluntary dismissal, an action is treated as if it had never been commenced. Goldstein v. Klivans, Inc. (App. 1931), 10 Ohio Law Abs. 133. Jurisdiction cannot be reclaimed by the court. However, *96as noted by the court of appeals below, the plaintiff failed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Hook v. HookOhio Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Estate of Johnson v. Randall Smith, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re Robert C. McCafferty Debtor. Robert C. McCafferty v. Marion McCaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Richard E. Hoover v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Fletcher v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.