Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Hollett

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 26, 2003No. 2002-346PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The petitioner, Erin Hollett, appeals an order by the Merrimack County Probate Court (Patten, J.) declaring the prenuptial agreement made between Erin and the decedent, John Hollett, to be valid. Erin argues that the agreement should be set aside because of duress, undue influence, insufficient financial disclosure, and lack of effective independent counsel. The respondents, Kathryn Hollett, the decedent’s first wife, and their five children, argue that the agreement is valid and the probate court’s order should be affirmed. We reverse and remand.

The following facts were found by the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lutgert v. LutgertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. In Re the Marriage of MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. MacFarlane v. RichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Duffy v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. In Re the Marriage of MatsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. Carignan v. New Hampshire International Speedway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. KoshySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. Mallen v. MallenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API