Legal Opinion

State v. Garcia

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1995No. 16527PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AC OB A, Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Charlemagne Laeara Garcia (Defendant) appeals his conviction and the order denying his motion to suppress evidence. He argues that the police illegally executed a warrant to search his apartment because they failed to demand entry in compliance with the requirements of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 803-37 (1985). Alternatively, he claims that the statute violates the Constitution of the State of Hawaii because it authorized the police to break open the door to his apartment when it was not immediately opened.

We agree with Defendant and therefore reverse…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  4. AIG Hawaii Insurance v. Estate of CaraangHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. CondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. DixonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BalberdiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. State v. ElenekiHawaii Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API