Legal Opinion

State v. Dixon

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1996No. 19147PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant State of Hawaii (the prosecution) appeals from the circuit court’s July 5, 1995 findings of fact (FOF), conclusions of law (COL) and order granting defendant-appellee Henry A Dixon’s (Dixon), aka Henry Lee Flazer, motion to suppress evidence retrieved by the Honolulu Police Department (HPD) during the execution of a valid arrest warrant. The prosecution argues that the trial court erred, as a matter of law, when it concluded that the HPD officers’ entry into Dixon’s hotel room was illegal. The prosecution maintains that entry was lawful because: (1)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Adcock v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. HaradaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. VallesterosHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BalberdiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API