Legal Opinion

Evans v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1969No. C.D. 3809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

These two protests, consolidated for purposes of trial, litigate once again the issue, previously litigated several times, as to whether used wool dryer felts are or are not dutiable as wool rags. The new factor here is that the issue arises now under the tariff schedules, whereas earlier cases were decided under the Tariff Act of 1930. The new provision for wool rags in the tariff schedules is different. It also is more precisely worded.

Following earlier decisions under the 1930 Act, used wool dryer felts in lai’ge rolls, such as those at bar, were classified in liquidation as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni Imperial Rug Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Train v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
  5. Floral Arts Studio v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API