Legal Opinion

City Nat. Bank of Mangum v. Crow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1910No. 558PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by the City National Bank of Manaron against Charles Crow and C. W. Gilliland. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: Wilbers v. Sowles, 31 Fed. 1; Cockrill v. Cooper, 86 Fed. 7, 29 C. C. A. 529; Stephens v. Overstoltz, 43 Fed. 465; Cooper v. Ilill, 94 Fed. 582; Boyd v. Schneider, 124 Fed. 239; Nat.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Greer County; G. A. Brown, Judge. Action by the City National Bank of Manaron against Charles Crow and C. W. Gilliland. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Citing: Wilbers v. Sowles, 31 Fed. 1; Cockrill v. Cooper, 86 Fed. 7, 29 C. C. A. 529; Stephens v. Overstoltz, 43 Fed. 465; Cooper v. Ilill, 94 Fed. 582; Boyd v. Schneider, 124 Fed. 239; Nat. Bank v. Wade, 84 Fed. 10; Brown v. Bank, 88 Tex. 265; Zinn v. Baxter, 65 Ohio St. 341, 11 Enc‘. PI. & Pr. 162, 168, 664.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, the former president and cashier, respectively, of said bank, to recover losses alleged to have been sustained by reason of excessive loans made “to one J. A. Calhoun, an alleged insolvent person, in violation of sections 5200, 5239, Eev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3494, 3515). The petition stated the facts in relation to the losses, in substance, as follows: That plaintiff’s capital stock was and is $25,000; that its unimpaired surplus fund never exceeded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Hun v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Cockrill v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  4. Spering's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  5. Stephens v. OverstolzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Corrigan v. Oklahoma Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Stuart v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. First Nat. Bank of Maud v. McKownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API