Legal Opinion
Corley v. Crompton-Highland Mills Inc.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 8, 1946No. 15576PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) No exceptions were taken to the original petition or to the interlocutory injunction. The petition was filed and the restraining order granted on April 26. By interlocutpry injunction dated May 11, the restraining order was continued in force. The bill of excep-' tions was presented to the trial judge June 6. Accordingly, the bill of exceptions was not presented in time to raise the question as to the validity of the petition or as to the interlocutory injunction. Code, § 6-903; Sweat & Mattox v. Georgia Naval Stores Co., 129 Ga. 571 (59…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carson v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Patten v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Russell v. Mohr-Weil Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Walker v. Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Pedigo v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Huckaby v. Griffin Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. CraveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Lassiter v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.