Legal Opinion

Lassiter v. Swift Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1948No. 16352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the expansive field of the respective constitutional rights of employers and employees many conflicting claims have been frequently asserted upon which court decisions have been rendered. We find in the excellent brief of counsel for the plaintiffs in error the following citations with quotations therefrom: Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S. 88 (60 Sup. Ct. 736, 84 L. ed. 1093): “In the circumstances of our times the dissemination of information concerning the facts of a labor dispute must be regarded as within that area of free…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Nann v. RaimistNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Carson v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Teamsters Local Union No. 528 v. Allied Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. McWhorter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  3. Huckaby v. Griffin Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Alred v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Alred v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API