Legal Opinion

Heard v. Pratt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1923No. 7041. [fn*]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Plaintiff in error sued defendants in error to cancel that certain lease to S. H. Burt, dated February 27, 1920, on 1,334 acres of land in Refugio county, Tex.

The lease, expressing a nominal consideration of $1, was for the “purpose,of mining and operating for oil and gas and of laying pipe lines, and of building tanks, power stations and structure thereon to produce, §ave and take care of said products,” and to “remain in force for a term of three years from this [its] date, and as long thereafter as oil or gas or either of them is produced from said land by the lessee.” A further…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Texas City Transp. Co. v. WintersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  2. McCallister v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Terry v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. McKay v. TallyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Forney v. WardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ehlinger v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ConnelleeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. 1464-Eight, Ltd. v. JoppichTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Allen v. Texas N. O. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Guleke v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API