Legal Opinion

McKay v. Tally

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1920No. 1615PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuee, C. J.

The appellees, Tally and wife, sued appellant; McKay, to cancel an oil lease on 590 acres of land in Clay county, upon the alleged ground that there was no consideration therefor, and because the same was void, in that it was an option or unilateral contract, and because the lessee, or his assigns, had done nothing towards beginning operations under the lease. The lease is to R. L. Schmidt, dated December 18, 1917, and was acknowledged on the same day by Tally and wife, and filed for record on that day. McKay appears to be the assignee of the lease from Schmidt. The lease in effect stipulates…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. National Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. TeelTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Paris Grocer Co. v. W.H. BurksTexas Supreme Court · 1907

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Standard Oil Company of Texas v. Lopeno Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. 1464-Eight, Ltd. v. JoppichTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Antwine v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cockerell v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API