Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This conviction was for unlawfully driving an automobile upon a public highway while under the influence of an intoxicant. Errors are assigned challenging first the preponderance of the evidence. The sole question under these assignments is whether or not defendant was at the time under the influence of an intoxicant.

While the evidence is somewhat in conflict, we find no such clear preponderance against the verdict of the jury, approved by the trial Judge, as calls for a reversal by this Court. In every case of conflicting testimony determination of the issue is peculiarly the province of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Graham v. McReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Clemons v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lookout Bank v. NoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Knights of Honor v. DicksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. GlebockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. Nichols v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Smith v. CampbellDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API