Legal Opinion

Lookout Bank v. Noe

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

FROM GRAINGER. Appeal from Chancery Court .of Grainger County. John P. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This attachment bill was hied by some of the creditors of S. B. Noe & Co., impeaching for fraud in law and fraud 'in fact a certain deed of assignment,' executed by them on the *2325th of May, 1885, and seeking' to subject the property therein named to the payment of debts against said firm.

The Chancellor heard the cause finally upon voluminous pleadings and proof, and adjudged the assignment to be “ fraudulent in law, and null and void,” and granted the other relief sought in the bill.

S. B. Roe & Co., their assignee, and numerous creditors, who claim benefits under the assignment, have appealed,…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. McAllester v. Aldridge (In Re Anderson)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  2. McCoy v. HightTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Waldschmidt v. Dennis (In Re Muller)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
  4. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. States Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Rode & Horn v. PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API