Legal Opinion

Clemons v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1893PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM HOUSTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Houston ■County. A. H. Muneoed, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The plaintiff in error, George Clemons, is under sentence for robbery. His counsel insist upon a reversal and new trial for several reasons:

First. — After the State’s evidence was closed, and two witnesses — Virgie Brown and Lou Brown —had been examined in behalf of the defendant, bis counsel offered to put him on the stand as a witness for himself, “stating that he had intended introducing defendant as a witness, but. by oversight had failed; that it, for the time, escaped his mind, and he never thought of it till Lou Brown was testifying; and that defendant would not testify on any subject…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. BrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Rounds v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. DengelWashington Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API