Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc., Plaintiffs-Cross v. Maxcess Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Maxcess Technologies, Inc. appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland denying its combined motion for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial, following a jury verdict in favor of Tate Access Floors, Inc. and Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. (collectively “Tate Access”), holding that claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent 4,625,491 are not invalid and were literally infringed. See Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. Maxcess Techs., Inc., No. Y-97-4213 (D.Md. Mar. 5, 1999) (informal order). Tate Access cross-appeals from the district…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Tate Access Floors, Inc. And Tate Access Floors Leasing, Inc. v. Interface Architectural Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Wenger Manufacturing, Inc. v. Coating MacHinery Systems, Inc. And Vector CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cat Tech LLC v. TubeMaster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Bradium Techs. LLC v. Andrei IANCUCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.