Bradium Techs. LLC v. Andrei IANCU
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Reyna, Circuit Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, Bradium Technologies LLC appeals final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board finding the claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,908,343 and 8,924,506 unpatentable as obvious in two inter partes review proceedings. Because the Board did not err in construing the relevant claim terms and because substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
I. The Patents at Issue
Bradium Technologies LLC ("Bradium") is the assignee of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,908,343 ("the '343 patent") and 8,924,506 ("the '506 patent"), both entitled…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sipco, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Automated Layout Technologies, LLC v. Precision Steel Systems, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2026
- Beijing Choice Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. v. Contec Medical Systems USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Cellwitch Inc. v. Tile, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Cellwitch Inc. v. Tile, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.