Schaible v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw. (Kinne, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error.' The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff was employed by the defendant company as a section hand. On the day of the injury for which this action was brought he was working in defendant’s yard at Manchester, scuffing on a side track. "While at work in the yard, certain cars had been backed onto this track by the use of an engine. After this had been done, the plaintiff claims he supposed the train was about to pull opt for Jackson, as he heard the bell of the engine ringing, and the engine was moving in that direction. He continued his work, when, unobserved by him, a car which had been shunted or kicked by the engine onto…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Peterson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Campbell v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Murphy v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
3Cited by9 opinions
- Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Tobey v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Carlson v. Cincinnati, Saginaw & Mackinaw RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Jones v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.