Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff is a native of Sweden, and on the sixth day of June, 1884, the date he was injured, was about £6 years of age, He was employed by the defendant as a car-repairer, and' worked in such employment for it from five to six weeks before he was hurt. He was hired by one Matth ews, who was the boss carpenter of the defendant. Matthews directed him to report to John Carlson, who was foreman of a gang of ear-repairers. He was told that Carlson would show him what to do. He.bad never worked at car-repairing or any other labor about railroads before. He had been in this country less than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abel v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. DolanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lellis v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Jones v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Schaible v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API