Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error to Gogebic. (Daboll, J., presiding.) Negligence case.. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 77 Mich. 136.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This case has been once before in this Court, and is reported in 77 Mich. 136. Only three of the Judges were sitting at the time of the argument. The judgment was reversed and the case remanded for a new trial; Mr. Justice Champlin 'and the writer of this opinion concurring in the reversal of the judgment, but reserving their opinion upon the question of defendant’s negligence, and agreeing to the reversal upon the ground that the declaration did not properly allege the defendant’s duty, and its neglect úo observe such duty. The case has been retried, resulting in a verdict and judgment for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hanks v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Duame v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hazzard v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1936

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API