Legal Opinion

Martin v. McReynolds

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1858PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal, by defendant O’Flynn, from the Wayne Circnit in Chancery. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court,

1Opinion of the Court

Manning J.:

Martin & Townsend, and one Ten Eyck, since deceased, on the 80th October, 1852, filed a bill in the circuit court of Wayne county to foreclose a mortgage, executed to the Farmers’ & Mechanics’ Bank by McReynolds and O’Flynn, and assigned by the bank to complainants. On the 1st of June, 1855, a petition was presented to the court by Martin & Townsend, stating the death of Ten Eyck after the filing of the bill, and that the cause of action survived to them, and *72praying an order allowing- the suit to proceed in their names as survivors; which was granted by the court. Three days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pattison v. HullCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York · 1828
  2. Jenny v. O'FlynnMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lannay v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Nims v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Hill v. BreedenWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Herman v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Adams v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API