Legal Opinion
Martin v. Federal Security Agency
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 8, 1947No. Civil Action No. 79PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This action is brought to review a final decision of the Social Security Board that the deceased wage earner, Carl P. Martin, was neither fully nor currently insured at the time of his death, that accordingly the claimant, Hannah Martin, is not entitled to widow’s current insurance benefits under Section 202 (e) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 402 (e), and Social Security Regulations No. 3 (20 C.F.R. Cum.Supp. 403), Sections 403.201 (a), *483403.202 (a) and 403.406 (a) (1), nor to child’s insurance benefits on behalf of Joseph H. Martin and Patricia L. Martin…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Social Security Board v. NierotkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Corp. Commission v. ZinnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Downs v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- Martin v. Federal Security AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Universal Protection Service v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015