Legal Opinion
Johnson & Johnson v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 27, 1972No. Civ. A. 977-69PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARTH, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Johnson & Johnson (hereinafter “Johnson”) manufactures and sells an adult talcum powder having deodorant properties bearing the trademark “Shower to Shower.” Defendant, Colgate-Palmolive (hereinafter “Colgate”) manufactures and sells an aerosol deodorant and anti-perspirant bearing the trademark “Hour After Hour.” The central issue presented here, and the test to be met by the plaintiff, is whether all the competent evidence offered to this Court carries “thorough conviction” that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board erred in sustaining Colgate’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Atlas v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Telechron, Inc. v. Telicon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Dresser Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Taj Mahal Enterprises, Ltd. v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Nestle Co., Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
- Driving Force, Inc. v. Manpower, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- American Home Products Corp. v. Chelsea Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.