Legal Opinion
S.B. Schmidt Paper Co. v. a to Z Paper Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 13, 1990No. CX-89-1636PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Nonresident buyer of paper from Minnesota corporation appeals from order denying motion to dismiss breach of contract claim for lack of personal jurisdiction by reason of insufficient contacts with Minnesota. Because we find there were insufficient contacts by the defendant with the forum state, we reverse and order the complaint be dismissed.
FACTS
Respondent S.B. Schmidt Paper Company, a Minnesota corporation, is a paper broker with its principal office in Burns-ville, Minnesota. Schmidt sells paper throughout the United States. Appellant A to Z Paper Company, a Louisiana…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Marshall v. Inn on Madeline IslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Viracon, Inc. v. J & L Curtain Wall LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Doe 1-22 v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Bellboy Seafood Corp. v. Kent Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.