Legal Opinion

Doe 1-22 v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1993No. C8-93-1428PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Appellant Roman Catholic Bishop of Fall River, Massachusetts, appeals the district court’s denial of summary judgment based on a determination that long-aim jurisdiction exists over the Fall River Diocese. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent James R. Porter was ordained as a priest in the Fall River Diocese of Massachusetts on April 2, 1960. Porter served as a priest in that diocese from 1960 to 1967. From August 1964 to September 1965, through the diocese, Porter received psychiatric treatment for pedophilia at a hospital in Wellesley, Massachusetts. In the fall of 1965, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Dent-Air, Inc. v. Beech Mountain Air Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. V.H. v. Estate of BirnbaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Bergherr v. SommerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. KSTP-FM, LLC v. Specialized Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Tercero v. Roman Catholic DioceseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API