Legal Opinion
Herrera v. Fluor Utah, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 1976No. 2221PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
The plaintiff brought suit in the district court for compensation for an occupational disease incurred while working for Fluor Utah, Inc. The suit was brought pursuant to the New Mexico Occupational Disease Disablement Law § 59-11-1 through § 59-11-43, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1). Judgment was entered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants appeal. We affirm.
The defendants present three points for reversal: (1) that plaintiff does not suffer from a compensable disease; (2) that the plaintiff is not totally disabled; (3) that the court erred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grain Handling Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Lelenko v. Wilson H. Lee Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Bober v. Independent Plating Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Aleutian Homes v. FischerAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- G & G SERVICES, INC. v. Agora Syndicate, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Denver v. HansenColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Martinez v. University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.