Legal Opinion
Martinez v. University of California
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1979No. 12463PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Chief Justice.
Petitioner sought compensation benefits for total permanent disablement under the New Mexico Occupational Disease Disablement Law (hereinafter referred to as the Act), §§ 52-3-1 to 59, N.M.S.A.1978. The district court concluded that petitioner’s disablement was within the meaning of § 52-3-32 and entered judgment in petitioner’s favor. Respondents appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed. We granted certiorari, and now reverse the Court of Appeals.
The question we address in this case is whether an employee, who is totally disabled by anxiety neurosis which manifests…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glodenis v. American Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Bowman v. Twin Falls Const. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Herrera v. Fluor Utah, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Jensen v. United Perlite CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Schober v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cisneros v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Means v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Buchanan v. Kerr-McGee Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.