Legal Opinion

Gore v. Canada Life Assurance Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by Henry H. Gore against the Canada Life Assurance Company for agent’s commissions. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff brought an action against the defendant, and recovered a judgment, for a balance claimed to be due him for commissions upon insurance premiums obtained from policies written for defendant’s patrons upon his solicitation. The defendant has brought the case to this court by writ of error.

At the threshold of the case is the question whether the plaintiff sustained contract relations with the defendant. His claim is that he was employed on behalf of the defendant by one Glass, with the subsequent approval of Bucknell, who was called the “manager of the Michigan branch.” The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradford v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Co. v. BrobstNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Dye v. CraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Coverdill v. Northern Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Deffenbaugh v. Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API