Equitable Life Assurance Co. v. Brobst
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from Adams county. Tried below before Morris, J. ■
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff to recover for his services in soliciting risks of life, insurance for the society. He states in his petition that he was employed by an agent of the company *527and had rendered services of the value of $350, on which there was a credit of $25.00.
The insurance company in its answer alleges that W. ~W. Craine, with whom the contract was made, “is the agent of the defendant for all of its business of the northwest; that said ~W. W. Craine receives a commission on all of said business coming through his office; that said W. W.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cosgrove v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- City of Davenport v. Peoria Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Bradford v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Johnson v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Gore v. Canada Life Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Shipley v. BaillieNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Shipley v. BaillieNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Shipley v. BaillieNebraska Supreme Court · 1996